Uncategorized

How will employment law change in 2013?

1. New state and federal laws and regulations will add employee rights and protections. In 2012, states like New Jersey and Oregon enacted laws protecting the jobless against hiring discrimination, and other states like California and Illinois enacted laws barring employers from demanding access to workers’ social networking accounts. The federal government is likely to follow suit with new protections proposed in recent bills, such as the Employment Non-Discrimination Act that bars sexual orientation discrimination,…

How will employment law change in 2013? Read More »

Supreme Court of Virginia Bans “Speaking Objections”

The Supreme Court of Virginia, effective January 1, 2013, banned “speaking objections” in Rule 4:5 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia. “Speaking objections” are those include argument and suggestions along with the basis of the objection.  They are often used in depositions by a lawyer to tip off or “educate” his client as to a desired answer.  A classic example of a “speaking objection” is “Objection! You’ve asked that question already and

Supreme Court of Virginia Bans “Speaking Objections” Read More »

Virginia Federal Court Denies Preliminary Injunctions to National Plant Food Companies

The U.S. District Court in Richmond, Virginia has denied the cross-motions for preliminary injunctions filed by rival grass seed companies, each of whom had asked the court to put a stop to the other’s allegedly false advertising claims. In the ongoing case of Scotts Company, LLC v. Pennington Seed, Inc., (Civil Action No. 3:12-cv-168) (Nov. 30, 2012), two of the biggest names in the grass seed/plant food business are suing each other over online and

Virginia Federal Court Denies Preliminary Injunctions to National Plant Food Companies Read More »

Virginia Federal Court Dismisses Age Discrimination Suit Where Plaintiff Accused of Violent Behavior

A 69-year-old plaintiff who sued his former employer for allegedly violating the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) learned a harsh lesson recently when the District Court awarded summary judgment to the employer: in discrimination cases, sometimes what actually happened isn’t nearly as important as what the employer believed to have happened. In Bandy v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Civil Action No. 7:11-cv-00365 (W.D. Va. Nov. 15, 2012), Roger Dean Bandy (“Bandy”) sued his former

Virginia Federal Court Dismisses Age Discrimination Suit Where Plaintiff Accused of Violent Behavior Read More »

Court Rejects Employee ADA Claim Based on Sore Back and Neck after Moving Furniture in Office

Earlier this month, the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed a federal court’s dismissal of an employee’s claims of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) discrimination and retaliation for his firing after hurting his back and neck on the job.  The court considered whether the plaintiff was “disabled” under the ADA, and ultimately determined that he failed to show that his alleged injuries rose to the level of a disability as a matter of

Court Rejects Employee ADA Claim Based on Sore Back and Neck after Moving Furniture in Office Read More »

Scroll to Top