Uncategorized

Virginia Federal Court Denies Preliminary Injunctions to National Plant Food Companies

The U.S. District Court in Richmond, Virginia has denied the cross-motions for preliminary injunctions filed by rival grass seed companies, each of whom had asked the court to put a stop to the other’s allegedly false advertising claims. In the ongoing case of Scotts Company, LLC v. Pennington Seed, Inc., (Civil Action No. 3:12-cv-168) (Nov. 30, 2012), two of the biggest names in the grass seed/plant food business are suing each other over online and…

Virginia Federal Court Denies Preliminary Injunctions to National Plant Food Companies Read More »

Virginia Federal Court Dismisses Age Discrimination Suit Where Plaintiff Accused of Violent Behavior

A 69-year-old plaintiff who sued his former employer for allegedly violating the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) learned a harsh lesson recently when the District Court awarded summary judgment to the employer: in discrimination cases, sometimes what actually happened isn’t nearly as important as what the employer believed to have happened. In Bandy v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Civil Action No. 7:11-cv-00365 (W.D. Va. Nov. 15, 2012), Roger Dean Bandy (“Bandy”) sued his former

Virginia Federal Court Dismisses Age Discrimination Suit Where Plaintiff Accused of Violent Behavior Read More »

Court Rejects Employee ADA Claim Based on Sore Back and Neck after Moving Furniture in Office

Earlier this month, the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed a federal court’s dismissal of an employee’s claims of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) discrimination and retaliation for his firing after hurting his back and neck on the job.  The court considered whether the plaintiff was “disabled” under the ADA, and ultimately determined that he failed to show that his alleged injuries rose to the level of a disability as a matter of

Court Rejects Employee ADA Claim Based on Sore Back and Neck after Moving Furniture in Office Read More »

Retaliation Claim Dismissed While Sexual Harassment Claim Based on Groping Incident Survives

The Federal Court in Roanoke, Virginia recently dismissed a plaintiff’s employment retaliation claim while allowing her sexual harassment and assault claims to proceed.  In Auriemma v. Logan’s Roadhouse, Inc., et al. Civil Action No. 7:12-cv-0284 (W.D. Va. Nov. 19, 2012), a former female employee sued the restaurant at which she had worked as a server, alleging sexual harassment, retaliation, and various state law torts (such as assault & battery). The plaintiff, Andrea Auriemma, had worked

Retaliation Claim Dismissed While Sexual Harassment Claim Based on Groping Incident Survives Read More »

A Male Employee’s Opposition to Hearing Crude Jokes by Male Supervisor Cannot Support a Retaliatory Firing Claim

The Federal District Court in Danville, Virginia recently dismissed a claim of retaliatory discharge by a male plaintiff fired for encouraging a female employee to complain about his supervisor’s jokes about public hair and male anatomy. The Court found that, while the employee thought that the alleged jokes were unlawful sexual harassment, his belief was not objectively reasonable. Rather, the alleged jokes were merely crude and boorish, and not severe or pervasive enough to rise

A Male Employee’s Opposition to Hearing Crude Jokes by Male Supervisor Cannot Support a Retaliatory Firing Claim Read More »

Scroll to Top